has always been one of the cornerstones of the Sept. 11 conspiracy, is that never any steel skyscraper has collapsed due to fire alone, which instead would WTC 7.
That statement could be the already discussed on the basis that if an event has never occurred previously does not mean that we should not occur.
History is full of unique events never occurred.
But the situation is a little more complex.
Why can enter a building in category "steel skyscraper that has collapsed" deve avere anche il suo bell'incendio.
E non parliamo di incendio "grosso", anche perchè il grosso è soggettivo. Sopratutto quando si vuole che la verità prenda una strada o l'altra, il grosso può diventare più piccolo o ancora più grosso.
Giusto per ricordare la vastità degli incendi del WTC7 ecco alcune foto dalle quali si vede chiaramente che il fumo sta uscendo dal WTC7 per l'intera altezza dell'edificio:
http://snipurl.com/1lmnlq
http://snipurl.com/1lmnwe
http://snipurl.com/1lmnzy
Ricordo inoltre che l'incendio al WTC7 ha potuto bruciare per diverse ore.
It was caused by the debris of the towers collapsed at 9:59 am (south tower) and at 10:28 (North Tower).
WTC7 collapsed at 17:21. It means that the fire was able to continue with its destructive action for over 7 hours.
Here is TOP 200 available in the world of skyscrapers in order of height.
From this list, I eliminated the skyscrapers whose structure is completely of cement (concrete) because they are not part of the series we are analyzing.
skyscrapers that were hit by fires on average important are these:
Petronas Tower 1
Wikipedia - Petronas Tower
Wikipedia recita così:
On the evening of 4th November, 2005, a fire broke out in the cinema complex of the Suria KLCC shopping centre below the Petronas Twin Towers, triggering panic among patrons who joined screaming in the thick, acrid smoke. There were no reports of injuries. The buildings were largely empty (except the shopping mall, Suria KLCC) because of the late hour; the only people involved were moviegoers and some diners in restaurants.
Quindi si tratta di un incendio ben lontano dall'entità di quello del WTC7
Empire State Building
Wikipedia - Empire State Building
At 9:40 a.m.on Saturday, July 28, 1945, a B-25 Mitchell bomber, piloted in thick fog by Lieutenant Colonel William Franklin Smith, Jr.,[41] crashed into the north side of the Empire State Building, between the 79th and 80th floors, where the offices of the National Catholic Welfare Council were located. One engine shot through the side opposite the impact and flew as far as the next block where it landed on the roof of a nearby building, starting a fire that destroyed a penthouse. The other engine and part of the landing gear plummeted down an elevator shaft. The resulting fire was extinguished in 40 minutes. 14 people were killed in the incident.
Qua invece si tratta dello schianto del B-25 contro il grattacielo. Il B-25 è un piccolo aereo del peso massimo di 16 tonnellate.
L'incendio è stato spento dopo 40 minuti.
Anche qua siamo lontani dall'incendio del WTC7.
The Trump Building - New York City
Wikipedia - The Trump Building
On the evening of May 20, 1946, a United States Army Air Forces C-45 Beechcraft airplane crashed into the north side of the building. The twin-engined plane was heading for Newark Airport on a flight originating at Lake Charles Army Air Field in Louisiana. It struck the 58th floor of the building at approximately 8:10 PM, creating a 20 by 10 foot hole in the masonry, and killing all five aboard the plane, including a WAC officer. Fog and low visibility were identified as the main causes of the crash. At the time of the accident, LaGuardia Field in heavy fog Reported That Reduced the ceiling to 500 feet, obscuring the view of the ground for the pilot at the building's 58th story level. Upon impact, Several parts of the aircraft, along with pieces of brick and mortar from the building, fell into the street below. However, there Were No Injuries Reported Any of the estimated of 2.000 workers in the building, nor anyone on the street.
The C-45 is a small plane of the maximum weight of 54 tons, and even here it seems that the damage was fairly low.
Aon Center
Wikipedia - Aon Center
This however is a most interesting case.
The fire extended at a rate estimated at 45 minutes per floor and burned intensely for Approximately Each level on 90 minutes. This resulted in two floors heavily Being Involved At Any Point During the fire. The upward extension Was stopped at the 16th floor level, after Completely destroying four and one-half floors of the building.
Here the damage is a bit 'wider than the previous examples.
However, this is a fire that was extinguished in four hours but affected only 4-story building.
Even here we are talking about a fire smaller than that of WTC 7.
There is another interesting case:
Windsor Tower
Wikipedia - Windsor Tower
Around midnight, on Saturday, February 12, 2005, a fire Was detected on the 21st floor. Quickly the fire spread throughout the Entire building, leading to the collapse of the Outermost, steel parts of the upper floors; Almost Firefighters needed 24 hours to Extinguish it. While seven Firefighters Were injured, nobody Was killed in the fire, Which Was arguably the worst in Madrid's history.
Here we read that the firemen have taken at least 24 hours to subdue the fire.
So why has not collapsed?
Also from wikipedia link just above to read the following:
It Was a very solid building, with a central core of reinforced That concrete resisted the high temperatures of the fire without collapsing.
words:
was a very solid structure with a central core that is reinforced concrete to withstand high temperatures of fires and prevent collapse.
more clearly than that. He had also worked
Paul Attivissimo here:
http://undicisettembre.blogspot.com/2007/11/zerobubbole-10-la-torre-spagnola-che.html
In particular, the link just above, we can see that this picture shows that the steel part is totally collapsed, but the core is concrete that is still standing and clearly visible:
http://snipurl.com/1ln2cc
To my knowledge, there have been other fires that can be analyzed in this context.
What conclusions you come to the conclusion?
It 's true that no steel skyscraper has ever collapsed due to a fire.
But it is equally true that no steel skyscraper has become the protagonist of a fire as extensive as that of WTC 7.
But it is a subjective matter.
Find a fire that burned for seven hours, which affected the number of planes involved in the WTC steel structure completely.
If you find a series like this then it makes sense to make comparisons.
It 's like a person to boast that he never caused any motor vehicle accident. And then he discovers that he has never even driven.
If they claim that a high-rise should collapse, we must also give him the chance.
Otherwise you the shape of suckers.
the next.
0 comments:
Post a Comment