Snooker Cues In West Midlands

A little bit of everything

I'm sorry to repeat myself, but the September 11 imperversa.

Il sito Mega Chip ha pubblicato un'intervista a Eric Margolis, giornalista:
http://snipurl.com/16u1aw

Anche di questa intervista non se ne sentiva proprio la mancanza.

L'articolo comincia nel migliore dei modi, dicendo che la testata Huffington Post avrebbe subito cancellato questo articolo scomodo.
Non c'è ovviamente alcuna prova che l'articolo era effettivamente presente prima.
Quel che è certo è che di articoli di Eric Margolis, la testata menzionata, ne è pieno, alcuni anche piuttosto pesanti, sicuramente più pesanti di questo articolo che, come vedremo, non dirà nothing, so I do not understand why this article would be removed because they are too uncomfortable.
http://snipurl.com/16u21s

I inspected the ruins of the Twin Towers in New York, where I happened often enough to dine at the restaurant on the top floor. The center ("Downtown") of Manhattan was enveloped in hideous stench, smelly due to the attacks. I had never smelled anything so foul. It took me days to get rid of this smell. Like New York, these events have greatly upset me, but I was not surprised, because nine days before I had planned a major attack against the U.S..

not want to understand where to end up talking about the "horrible stench". Perhaps you mean that the mark was hiding right there? Then comes
said Eric Margolis, September 2 would have predicted the attacks with the phrase published in Sun Media. Obviously dont bring any evidence to support this thing

Economic interests and U.S. policy in the Middle East and the Muslim world are under threat from agony of Palestine, which inevitably defends planning terrorist acts targeted at the U.S. wealth and even the citizens themselves

does not seem to see the prophecies in this particular phrase, also remember that Osama Bin Laden was already a noted special before 11 September.
http://undicisettembre.blogspot.com/2010/07/bin-laden-sconosciuto-prima-dell119-era.html

L'articolo, dopo la menzione della solita presunta mancanza di detriti, si butta sulla mancata intercettazione da parte dei caccia americani degli aerei dirottati.

Nel 1993, il mio volo Lufthansa per il Cairo è stato dirottato mentre sorvolava la Germania. Il pirata dell'aria di origine etiope, ci ha riportato fino a New York. Minacciava di fare schiantare l'aereo su Wall Street.

Il nostro aereo fu intercettato dai caccia F15 americani che avevano ricevuto l'ordine di sparare in caso di necessità. Ma dov’era la difesa aerea l’11 settembre 2001?

No mention on how long after the hijacking took place on the plane was traveling Margolis, has been intercepted.
Some small research ideas that hijacking is not clear, since in these links there is no mention of the interception:
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/1701983 /
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_notable_aircraft_hijackings

In the second link we find traces of that hijacking. The plane was from Germany landed in New York. No one knows when the interception occurred on the part of American fighters. It could have happened in any Flight time between Germany and New York.

A Pakistani, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, he claimed to be the mind of September 11, but after that the CIA tortured him by subjecting it to 183 seats with simulated drowning.

False.
The claim by Pakistan came when he was still free.
http://undicisettembre.blogspot.com/2007/03/khalid-sheikh-mohammed-fui-io.html

I then forwarded the video to confirm that Bin Laden was guilty of false are poorly packaged. Were found in their view of men in Afghanistan fighting the Northern Alliance i taliban, che era stata creata e finanziata dai servizi segreti russi.

Falso.
Cronistoria di tutti i video con Osama e sue rivendicazioni.
http://undicisettembre.blogspot.com/2007/04/al-qaeda-ammissioni-e-rivendicazioni.html

Ho incontrato Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan e ho detto alla CNN che non era l'uomo che appariva su questi video.

Ovviamente nulla a supporto di questa affermazione.

Peraltro, ho detto e ripetuto fin dal giorno dell’11/9 come la pericolosità e le dimensioni di al-Qa‛ida fossero state immensamente esagerate, cosa del resto confermata dal prestigioso Istituto Internazionale Strategic Studies (IISS) in the explosive report published this week in London. The number of members of al-Qaeda was born to fight the Afghan communists have never exceeded 300 units.

Even here no evidence to support the claims.
Moreover, the scale of Al Qaeda have been so tremendously exaggerated that the secret services and the U.S. government has ignored the dangers of the organization.

Going back to September 11, I can not understand how the amateur pilots have been able to maneuver at low altitude aircraft of this size and just hit the WTC and the Pentagon. As I pointed out an agent of the Intelligence pakistana, «se fossero stati veramente dei dilettanti, avrebbero fatto schiantare i loro aerei l'uno contro l'altro, non sul World Trade Center!».

Cosa sta dicendo?
E' più difficile centrare la torre gemella (la cui base era un quadrato il cui lato era di circa 64 metri ed era alta 415 metri) o il pentagono (superficie di 600.000 metri quadrati), che si sa, sono edifici fermi, che un altro aereo in volo?
Sta scherzando spero....

Poi prosegue con una bella presa di posizione fine a se stessa:

La Commissione di inchiesta sull’11/9 e stata un'operazione di cancellazione, come tutte le commissioni governative. Esse created specifically to conceal and not to reveal the truth.

Then a bit 'of statistics:

In 2006, a survey by Scripps Howard and the Washington Post revealed that 36% of a sample of 1,000 Americans questioned believed that there was behind the attacks on the U.S. government . There are many Americans who do not believe the official version / 11 September.

What! Dr Jackal did not say that 80% of the population to the dangers he believes job?
http://skybuck.blogspot.com/2010/09/i-nuovi-undicisettembrini.html
Well, get at least agree on something!
Apart from the irony. E ' evidente che quindi una statistica, sempre che sia vera, è strettamente collegata alla fascia età delle persone interpellate, alla zona interpellata, al livello di istruzione, al momento in cui è stato fatto il sondaggio.

E qua arriva un'affermazione molto interessante:

Ma ancora più scioccante, la registrazione del colloquio a Londra tra il presidente George Bush e il primo ministro Tony Blair, laddove si sente il presidente degli USA fare questa terribile proposta per scatenare la guerra con l'Iraq: dipingere degli aerei USA con colori dell'ONU e provocare le difese aeree irachene per spingerle ad attaccare sparando ebcreando così un "casus belli". Bush avrebbe anche preannunciato a Blair che dopo l'Iraq, would attack Saudi Arabia, Syria and Pakistan.

This is new to me. Specifically, where can I find the recording of this interview? The one where Bush talks about the plan to paint U.S. aircraft with UN colors? Then
Margolis mentions examples from the past to show that it is a tactic used in other circumstances. And what does this mean?

To an old journalist like me, that smells like rotten. There are really too many unanswered questions, too many suspects, and then let us not forget the famous phrase of Cicero, who says, "cui bono", "Who benefits from this?"

There are many unanswered questions for you, despite being a journalist, you do not document it should be.

Then are mentioned in bulk sample misdeeds of the Russian secret service.
probably with the intention to support this: see? The Russians did. Why should not Americans do? It does not wrinkle
ujn speech right? Just before the invasion

polls showed that 80% of Americans were convinced, wrongly, that Saddam Hussein was behind 9 / 11 attacks.

This too is new to me. Where can I find a poll like that?
From the outset it was clear, from the manner of the attacks, that behind the massacres there were Al Qaeda.
Where did that idea?

September 11 served to justify the invasions of Afghanistan and the strategic oil-rich Iraq.

It is now clear because it turned out the thing that the Americans, after September 11, was behind Saddam Hussein. In order to justify not only the invasion of Afghanistan but also Iraq.

Finally yet another battle cry of conspiracy:

attacks have plunged the American people into wars against the Muslim world and have enriched the U.S. arms industry.

And they plunged the whole world, especially the U.S. just in a crisis unprecedented financial. Financial crisis in which we are still submerged.

But to this day I do not have tests such as September 11 was a conspiracy hatched by the extreme right or Israel, or is the result of a gigantic project of screening ("cover-up ').

After all that you wrote this article about "despite everything I have no proof that there was a cover."

definitely not miss this article.

Gift Backet With Baileys Irish Cream

New undicisettembrini

Luckily the anniversary of September 11 falls once a year.
But the next September 11th will be the hardest because they will be 10 years from the killings of 11 September. A promising

conspiracy, member of LC, namely Dr-Jackal has pubblicaoto his side conspiracy FAQ: http://snipurl.com/15xt3h
There was really needed?
Maybe.
Just to realize how Brancolino undicisettembrini plots in the dark.
We start from a premise: Dr Jackal is self-referenced. Puts a link to try something that points to a page on its site. If it is not his own site is a page of LC.

The leitmotiv of every conspiracy theorist has always been that it is not for them to say what would really happened.
But Dr Jackal finally gives us a version of what would Gone are the facts according to him. Consider yourself
the favorable opinions on the forum, I would say that most users of LC supports this explanation of events.

It would be really spend a whole day, and perhaps not enough to talk about all the corny things that are mentioned, but the arguments are already addressed by others, or where they would have finished the wings and engines, famous reel front of the Pentagon, the phone calls impossible, an apparent lack of debris on the site of the disaster, the molten steel, the symmetry of the collapse of the towers, the hijackers are still alive and so on and so forth.

mention Operation Northwoods great workhorse of many conspiracy theorists, deserve:

... the 1962 document in which they were proposed to the then Minister of Defence various types of auto-attack in which he would then blame Cuba, to have an excuse to invade [....] For many years, Operation Northwoods was considered only a legend without foundation, but when the documents were finally declassified [...] Despite then-President John F. Kennedy rejected this plan, it is nevertheless indisputable proof of the criminal mentality and ruthless that top government and military of a nation can develop ...

addition to blame for something that has never been done, overlooks the fact Jackal che è stato proprio il governo USA a descretare dei documenti che probabilmente qualsiasi altro governo non avrebbe esitato a triturare.


Arriviamo invece alla ricostruzione degli eventi secondo Dr Jackal ed il fatto che secondo lui sarebbero bastate una sessantina di persona in totale.
Nel dettaglio:

Come si è già detto, secondo un esperto di demolizioni per piazzare cariche esplosive nelle Torri Gemelle sarebbero bastate 30 persone per 4 mesi di lavoro

Ok. 4 mesi di lavoro per piazzare gli esplosivi e 30 persone quando non interessa mascherare gli esplosivi piazzati, ma nelle torri gemelle era necessario farlo senza essere scoperti. Quindi facciamo anche 6 mesi di lavoro perchè i tecnici dovevano far sparire qualsiasi traccia di piazzamento degli esplosivi.
Ma se andiamo a vedere un altro link che viene utilizzato come cavallo di battaglia, ovvero  http://snipurl.com/15y1vx  vediamo che l'esperto di demolizioni Tom Sullivan dice:

Sullivan sottolinea che la preparazione richiede diverse settimane per "indebolire" gli edifici prima delle demolizioni. Gli edifici con struttura in acciaio semplicemente non cadono entro il perimetro della loro base in caduta libera senza un grosso lavoro lungo tutto l’edificio, a volte anche prima di piazzare le cariche esplosive.

Quindi ai 6 mesi accennati aggiungiamo altri 2 mesi per indebolire la struttura. We are going to 8 months.

And architects and engineers who have studied where to place the explosives? At least as 4 months of study and at least 5-6 people to guess. And we are 12 months a year. But if that
told by Dr Jackal add what it says here MM http://snipurl.com/15y1ci to post 406:

Unable to start the demolition from the bottom, as is normally for the twin towers were used sequences different from the usual ...

Mazzucco said to have been used sequences different from usual because the collapse started from the top, whereas a collapse of a controlled demolition to start from the bottom.
You mean it went well the first time around? If you do not allow the tasks of the hijackers because they were too difficult to realize we can not even admit that a collapse succeeds so well because we used a technique never used before.
have done some tests on artificial towers built specifically not in some secret lab is not it?
Someone I built? Other accomplices? Then we
between the builders of the towers hypothetical feints and engineers who have designed, we assume 100 people and 12 months? But we are very very optimistic. And as we go
time to 24 months. Dr Jackal
also uses the tactic of "modulizzazione. That says that the technicians who worked on a part of the project does not actually know the final aim. Ok, the speech stands during the project, but once you see the towers go down you are a suspect.
you do a silly example: 30 engineers are challenged to understand what it takes to place the explosives to bring down the towers and is said to have carried out a search for safety. Engineers also believe we can at the moment, but then seeing the collapse of the towers, well, the alarm bell will ring at the top right? However

said 24 months of study.
But we admit that the thing of the towers is fake too, and keep in mind also the 12 months.
Bush Jr began his tenure January 20, 2001.
means that the plan would begin to slaughter more than one year (or 3 months) before the term of Bush Jr.
So even Democrat Bill Clinton was embroiled in the top 11?
none of you conspiracy theorists ever thought that assuming the inside job?
Damn, the number of complications increases. Let's see how it continues

Dr Jackal:

To falsify sixty-six tearful phone calls (technically impossible) by the passengers of the aircraft would have been sufficient only 1 person in front of a computer with audio editing software suitable

And no relatives of the victims realize that this is not the voice of the beloved died in attacks?

The disappearance of the aircraft scheduled to enter the Pentagon would have required a disclaimer of 20in or less, depending on the method chosen (if repainted, disassemble, or merge it into the ocean end remote controls - in this case one would have sufficed single person!).

Yeah, right. And the radar tracks, which identify the aircraft that ends at the bottom of the ocean? So too are complicit
insiders radar, or are complicit in those who tampered with the radar tracks, more than a single person.

For the launch of the missile (or the small remote-controlled aircraft) into the Pentagon, again, a single person with his finger on the right button.

a single person who is responsible for preparing the rocket, make the necessary checks, the head, and throws it? Of course, as you said before, those who prepared the missile could not know what would be served, but in hindsight you realize that what was needed. And what the heck!
And even here the discourse of the radar tracks. You can tell at a track that what you see is not a plane but a missile. Accomplices also engaged in tracks?

for disseminating the fake wreckage and personal effects of passengers on places of "crash" 5-6 would have been too many people, since there were so few scraps to get into a van and the Pentagon in Pennsylvania (which is proprio uno dei motivi per cui la gente ha cominciato a dubitare della versione ufficiale). 

Evito di commentare questa affermazione perchè i rottami non ci sono se non li vai a cercare.

Per la falsificazione dei videomessaggi di bin Laden (che, da parte sua, si è sempre dichiarato innocente) sarebbe bastata, di nuovo, 1 persona davanti a un computer col programma adatto.

Attorno ad Osama Bin Laden ci sono i suoi più stretti collaboratori, quindi altri complici, e sono tutti complici gli esperti che hanno detto che il filmato è autentico?

 Infine, per impedire che l'aviazione intervenisse e ostacolasse i finti dirottamenti, come abbiamo said, it is enough that a single man, Donald Rumsfeld, to take in hand the full power of decision in case of hijacking and held the aircraft on the ground. Even here

radar traces to be manipulated to keep aircraft on the ground, pilots in aircraft that were not parties to intercept the hijacked planes. All accomplices threatened or paid?

And what about the risk of someone after you speak and reveal everything to avoid it just as dirty in any transaction which must remain confidential, to use a small team of specialists

Other accomplices "dumb" not counted in the 60 .

that can be kept under close and continuous monitoring, e che alla peggio possano venire eliminati senza clamori

I complici aumentano in modo esponenziale.

Dr Jackal, la tua analisi è quanto mai superficiale.
Inoltre l'utente di LC cerca di rafforzare le sue tesi mostrando uno screenshot di un sondaggio della CNN.
A parte il fatto che tale sondaggio è totalmente fuori contesto, quindi non si capisce quante persone sono state interpellate, la fascia di età, il livello di istruzione ecc..
La cosa che però salta all'occhio è questa: non viene chiesto che l'11 settembre è un inside job, ma viene chiesto:
Credi che ci sia una copertura governativa sui fatti dell'11 settembre?
E poi:
Se d'accordo con Charlie Sheen that the government hides the real events of 11 September?
Which is not to say that most people think of me all'autoattentato that the government is hiding something much more general sense, which means that maybe has been neglected the threat of Osama Bin Laden, that someone was wrong , and that is evident in that day and so on.
short, the survey does not say for sure what you want him to say.
E 'question in Italian.
Here you can find statistics a bit more precise and detailed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks_opinion_polls

Again, everything is supported by simple conjecture. No evidence was ever brought to support the thesis dell'autoattentato.

short, if these are the new plots, of which there will be fun.

Brazilian Institute For Oriental Studies

Frances Oman, very ill or very clever?

E 'released an article that talks about LC Frances Oman.
Here you will find a biography, taken from his site direttametne:
http://www.miraclemaven.com/images/F_Oman_Press_Kit.pdf

I went to see information on Discovery Channel, which, according to the biography of Frances Omna, would work, but have not found any trace of the name. Does anyone know anything about it?

assume that the show is this, and also on the Internet Movie Database there is no trace of this persona:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0995483/fullcredits#cast

Su LC c'è riportata un'intervista fatta da Massimo Mazzucco a questa Frances Oman, che sarebbe stata colpita da un sarcoma. Faccio presente che l'intervista è stata tradotta probabilmente dallo stesso Mazzucco, quindi, al momento, non ho ancora avuto tempo di verificare la bontà della traduzione effettuata.
Vediamo alcuni brani dell'intervista:

...e poi sono finita da uno dei migliori oncologi della California. Lui fece una biopsia, e fu allora che ebbi la diagnosi di sarcoma aggressivo dei tessuti morbidi. A quel punto era diventato più o meno così, era come un paio di prugne, divided into two parts.

So does a visit from his doctor that he had apparently performed a biopsy. Let's see what the oncologist said:

must undergo surgery immediately, it should come immediately to the preliminary examination, and must proceed immediately with the operation

But Mrs. Frances Oman, which is defined investigative journalist, is not lost of mind and start looking on the internet:

I did not know much of the cancer, but they are an investigative journalist, and I immediately jumped online to do research. I found the Gerson Institute, and I called to talk with them.

So Mrs. Frances Oman decided to follow the treatment given Gerson Institute ( http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Gerson and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Gerson ).
And in the end, through knowledge, comes to our beloved Simoncini.

Let's see how he would have taken the oncologist of Oman:

I came home, I called my oncologist, and I told him everything I had done. And he sent me a letter basically "fired me," he told me that she would not have anything to do with me, because I had not done what he had recommended me, and he warned that rinsing the zone like that of course I would have sent the cancer around the body, and then I will probably remain just a living. Even my GP dismissed me and told me that I would have cared more for what I did.

And we see what he would have said Simoncini:

I can not promise anything, because I never know what that can happen, but I tell you one thing: in my experience, according to my stats, any patient of mine who have tested clean after three months, who has been diagnosed cancer free, has never had a relapse. He never came back elsewhere, and has never reappeared. Of course, it may come to her again il cancro, ma non a causa di questo. Dopo 2 o 3 anni è possibile che magari le venga un nuovo tipo di cancro…

Così la Oman è tutta felice di avere trovato finalmente una persona preparata.

Finalmente avevo trovato, con una modifica all’assicurazione, un oncologo disposto a seguirmi. Lui era aperto di mente, ma era anche profondamente spaventato per la mia vita. In base a quello che gli avevano insegnato, infatti, lui era convinto che il cancro mi si sarebbe sparso dappertutto. 

Ricordo che Simoncini non è né medico, né tanto meno oncologo. Simoncini non può esercitare la professione di medico perchè radiato dall'albo. 

Alla fine, per farla semplice, tramite applicazioni di bicarbonato la signora guarisce.
Il tutto sarebbe documentato anche da un video.
Tutto è finito bene dunque?
Sembra di sì.
Ma...

La signora Frances Oman è una scrittrice.
http://www.miraclemaven.com/
Ed una persona aperta alle cure alternative:
http://kickingcancer.org/
In questo sito si sponsorizza apertamente l'istituto Gerson e l'operato di Simoncini.
E l'intestatario del dominio è la stessa Frances Oman:
http://www.whois.net/whois/kickingcancer.org

La prima volta il cancro alla signora è stato diagnosed February 14, 2007. The deal was made with baking November 27, 2007.

From here:
http://www.allwhois.com/

miraclemaven.com Instead we find that the domain was registered on March 16, 2007.

So one month after diagnosis, when his life was in chaos because of the evil diagnosed, Ms. Oman is the desire and the time to register the domain. How very curious.

Other considerations:

• interview Ms. Oman has not mentioned in any way, as the oncologist who had applied initially;
• we have no idea how it was indeed cancer, since it was serious, if he was actually sick, why was not given any medical records. It would be very useful to have a copy of his medical history. Obviously I'd understand anything there, but who is more competent sottoporrei;
• information on discovery channel there is no trace of this lady Frances Oman, but I look any further checks from other people because he has denounced
• your doctor? If you really want to continue the discussion Simoncini, why not bring to the fore this fact, which if verified, would be an absolute gravity? Instead you keep it hidden, so, you become complicit in the desire to hide the "truth" about cancer?

One last thought:
in the movie can not be seen clearly that the hypothetical tumor was surgically removed? But the good
Simoncini and company have not always told to avoid like the plague the surgical removal of damaged tissue?
also was not appropriate to make further tissue removed for biopsy to see if it really was cancer?
What evidence there would have been better than that which could be healed of her cancer without radiation therapy after the results of the biopsy of tissue removed?
And again: why the movie is not intact? Why is not the removal of tissues? You can not have the entire movie from the initial cut, until the closure of the wound?

Mazzucco once said, faced a similar testimony: "Why should not I believe this person?"
I add: "And why should I believe her, as he has said things that anyone, even those in perfectly good health, could that mean?"
And look at this case and Robinson Frances Oman, sells books.

to think evil is a sin but ....

UPDATE - 21/09/2010
In the video, towards the end of the movie, we see that the catheter is placed, as explained in the interview, in order to continue the washing with baking soda.
I was pointed out by an expert (if I say I can do I can also tell you who it is) that what is inserted a catheter does not seem at all but a drainage tube, and not to flow from something 'outside to inside, but the opposite, namely to "leak", drain fluids (blood, serum ...) from the wound.
Look at this:
http://www.hmss-partners.com/1/pompette_per_aspirazione_1803981.html
seems exactly what you see in the movie.
Moreover in the last frame of the movie you see the pump full of pink liquid, more evidence suggesting that there is something in the pump comes from within and not to be baking soda, instead, during the operation, used syringes, it seems absolutely colorless.
So, after all the concerns expressed so far, it seems that after the operation was not carried out any washing soda.

As I said before, to think the worst is a sin but ....

Mystic Tan Acrylic Nails

Finally I can say! Naughty

was about time!

I have finally been accepted in the list of super experts who have come together to learn the truth about September 11th. The real truth.
It was expected that both the time and I will tell you, I was hoping there almost.
be put on the same page of giants such as Robert Balsamo, Ralph Kolstad, or the great Ted Muga ..
Well .. What fills me with pride gentlemen. I am bloated.

bad that I've ever done in my life any software to control towers. And even knowing which side you start.

After the deal "Maximum Reliability" ( http://complottismo.blogspot.com/2007_09_01_archive.html ), "Pilots for Truth" has done nothing to tighten controls to select people who apply to join the group.
And so he did with me.
And what is the best date to accept a new member in their gruppo?
Bhe.. l'11 settembre 2010, ovvio.
La richiesta l'avevo fatta a fine giugno ed è stata accettata l'11 settembre.
Giusto giusto per urlare al mondo intero gli n mila membri del gruppo nel giorno dell'anniversario.

Tornando a bomba, nonostante io non abbia mai creato software per torri di controllo il gruppo ha accettato la mia iscrizione comunicandomelo via mail.
La mail dice:

Thank you for your interest in our organization. It is an honor to have you join our ranks. After a brief verification process, we will add you to our core member list during the next update. 

Alla faccia del breve processo di verifica. Non mi hanno nemmeno chiesto qualche referenza more. Neither the name of the software on which I worked.

The temptation to follow up on what's been, I admit.
But this is enough to prove that they are rigorous in their inspections of those Pilots for Truth.
I do not know how long my name will remain on the list of experts, but so have all the documentation to prove its acceptance in the group without any hesitation.

Meanwhile, this is a small proof of acceptance took place on September 11:

The next time a friend / enemy conspiracy you slap in the face Pilots for Truth has n thousand affiliates, bhe, show him this link. And what di "Massimo dell'Affidabilità".
Se cambia idea allora qualche speranza c'è. Se non cambia idea, lasciate perdere, non ne vale la pena.

AGGIORNAMENTO - 27/09/2010
Come avrete visto dai commenti,. quelli di Pilots for Truth, si sono accorti che le mie conoscenze di fantasia erano di fantasia.
Bella forza, gliel'ho detto io. Nonostante tutto hanno impiegato 16 giorni, per accorgersene.
E lo mettono nei commenti alla fine di questo articolo che sono stati io a farglielo notare. Bravi!
Oltretutto, Pilots for Truth non pubblica delle scuse con i loro lettori per l'errore commesso, promettendo di essere più attenti nella selezione delle persone applying to be included among the States, but aims to attack the person who discovered that they accept anyone who asks to join, simply search experts.

And the joke comes directly from Rob Balsamo, that we have become accustomed to all manner of insult and injury.
And what did Rob Balsamo? I was removed from the list? No!
It changed my position and made me "liar" or a liar.

further evidence, if still needed, of how not to rub anything in those Pilots for Truth get to the truth and very little of their professionalism. The important thing is to sell their gadgets and exposes them as cowards who attack profiteers, as they are.

I note that on their home page there are things sbufalate time, such as the famous door of the cabin that would always be closed , and then the diversion would not have been possible.
http://undicisettembre.blogspot.com/2009/12/non-aprite-quella-porta.html

UPDATE Part II - 27/09/2010
I have been on the forum pointed out that LC I made a mistake in saying "Bella strength, I told myself."
E 'was another user, Decalagon, which ended up on my blog, has seen fit to warn Rob Balsamo from good dog he is.
Obviously if I had not reported the issue on my blog, Rob Balsamo non sarebbe venuto mai a conoscenza del fatto che io non sono affatto uno sviluppatore di software per torri di controllo.
Decalagon, siamo un po' a corto di argomentazioni se ci attacchiamo alla lingua italiana eh?
Mi ricorda qualcosa questa tua correzione. Qualcosa che ha a che fare con il controluce.. ma proprio non riesco a ricordamelo...
Tra l'altro sto aspettando la risposta da Rob Balsamo a queste mie tre domande:
- Come mai sono stato messo fra i piloti quando pilota non sono?
- Che tipo di verifiche sono state fatte da Balsamo per appurare che io fossi davvero quello che dicevo di essere?
- Perchè la mia ammissione al gruppo è avvenuta proprio l'11 settembre quando io la richiesta l'avevo fatta a fine June? It's not that you had to show everyone, as there are members of the group, so it was necessary to increase the number of members on the anniversary of its true? No, probably I'm wrong. Was it a case.

Use Shortening As Moisturizer

a comparison Assange

sure you have read in recent times the issue of Assange and accusations of rape directed against him and then apparently retracted, and then again under investigation.
For those who did not know who is Julian Assange: Wikileaks is an international organization that receives documents covered by secrecy and publish them on its website. These documents are received from sources covered by anonymity.
Assange is part of the direction of Wikileaks

Il 22 agosto esce la notizia che verso Assange sarebbe stato spiccato un mandato di arresto a causa di accuse rivoltegli di stupro e di violenza sessuale, mandato di arresto che sarebbe stato poi ritirato, in quanto sarebbe necessario svolgere ulteriori indagini.
La notizia sarebbe partita da un tabloid svedese, Expressen e poi riportata, tra le altre, anche dalle principali testate italiane.
http://www.corriere.it/esteri/10_agosto_22/wikileaks-assagne-pentagono_e7d0b9a6-adee-11df-8e8b-00144f02aabe.shtml
http://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2010/08/22/news/assange_pentagono-6432266/

Vi volevo intanto far notare la differenza fra le due testate:
il Corriere riporta:

«Non ho nessuna idea di chi possano essere». Juliane Assange passa al contrattacco dopo le accuse che hanno spinto i procuratori svedesi a spiccare (e ritirare dopo poche ore) un mandato d'arresto per violenza sessuale nei suoi confronti.

Quindi, a giudicare dal Corriere ciò che è stato ritirato è il mandato di arresto.

Repubblica invece dice:

 "Non so chi vi sia dietro a queste accuse, ma sicuramente ci avevano detto che il Pentagono avrebbe cercato di usate sporchi trucchi per distruggerci". Così Julian Assange ventila, in modo neanche tanto velato, l'ipotesi che vi possa essere il Pentagono dietro alla vicenda delle accuse prima mosse, e poi ritirate...

Reading Republic instead it seems that the charges were withdrawn by the two women.
In truth the allegations have not been removed because it was necessary to make findings on the merits of the allegations, as we will see later.

Assange, from the beginning, did not hesitate to point to the Pentagon, guilty, according Assange, of plotting the attack as a result of documents published on the war in Afghanistan.
Let's see what he just said the accusations had been leveled:

"I do not know who is behind these accusations, but certainly we were told that the Pentagon would try to use dirty tricks to destroy us."

And again:

Assange, che si trova nella casa di un amico nel nord della Svezia e che intende rimanere nel Paese finché la vicenda non sarà del tutto chiarita, punta poi il dito proprio contro il Pentagono: «Ci avevano detto che avrebbe cercato di usate sporchi trucchi per distruggerci». 

Non si sa bene chi gli aveva detto che il Pentagono avrebbe usato sporchi trucchi.

Il 7 settembre compare una nuova notizia sulla vicenda:
http://www.corriere.it/cronache/10_settembre_07/wikileaks-maretta-elvira-pollina_f3d6f2b2-ba99-11df-a688-00144f02aabe.shtml
Vediamo alcune parti dell'articolo:

Una parte dei membri che contribuiscono al funzionamento della machine has downloaded the site's spokesman, the Australian Julian Assange, founder, face and soul of the organization, accused of rape in Sweden. Allegations that Assange merely dismissed as the result of a murky maneuver at the Pentagon to discredit

The article continues:

Birgitta Jonsdottir, WikiLeaks activist and member of the Icelandic Parliament, in an interview with the Daily Beast, has expressed the dissatisfaction of some of the staff of the site, and asked Assange to take a step back, leaving the spokesman.

are mentioned some statements by Birgitta Jonsdottir, activist and member of Wikileaks del parlamento islandese nonché amica di Assange:

«Non sono arrabbiata con Julian ma la situazione gli è chiaramente sfuggita di mano» ha osservato. «Queste sono questioni private che non hanno nulla a che vedere con WikiLeaks. Gli ho chiesto con forza di concentrarsi sui suoi problemi giudiziari e di lasciare che sia qualcun altro a portare avanti la nostra causa». La Jonsdottir non usa mezzi termini. «Qualcuno doveva dirlo, non importa se verrò estromessa per questo. Quello che m'interessa è WikiLeaks e io mi considero un'amica di Julian. Ma i buoni amici sono le persone che hanno il coraggio di dirti se la tua faccia è sporca. 

Poi Birgitta Jonsdottir rincara la dose: The

Jonsdottir, who knows Swedish, he says that you have read the documents and newspaper articles, but they found no trace of any conspiracy. "There is no reason to doubt - or be sure - the sincerity of the two women who have raised allegations against Assange" he said, reiterating that he wanted to be neutral, without wishing to belittle the seriousness of what denounced. But if the idea of \u200b\u200bthe matter is done: in his view, the allegations could be the result of a cultural misunderstanding in what appears to be "a classic love triangle." "Julian - said the Icelandic Parliament - can be brilliant in many ways, but it has great capacity to relate ed è il tipico australiano un po' maschilista».  

Infine l'articolo si conclude così:

Un altro attivista di WikiLeaks, che ha parlato sotto la condizione dell'anonimato, ha fatto sapere che nelle ultime settimane Assange ha resistito a diversi tentativi messi in atto all'interno del sito affinché lasciasse i suoi incarichi a seguito delle indagini. Una protesta che sarebbe culminata, pochi giorni fa, con una sorta di sciopero, che ha comportato il blocco dell'operatività del sito, ufficialmente per ragioni tecniche. «Era un modo per spingere Julian a ripensare la situazione: i nostri tecnici gli hanno mandato un messaggio».

Il giorno dopo Repubblica pubblica rather than an article, where, strangely, Birgitta Jonsdottir is not even mentioned, as nothing is mentioned of protests within the organization.
Let's see what the article says:

were two women, 20 August, accusing Assange, one of rape, Anna Ardin, and one of sexual assault. AFP, Assange admitted that he had met the two women but has refused to say whether he had had intimate relations with them, stressing that it is "a private matter." "It 's clearly a case mounted by those involved and Expressen"

The article concludes:

The Australian has proved prudent as a possible implicazione americana...

Quindi il tenore dei due articoli, del Corriere e della Repubblica, sono ben diversi.
Mentre Corriere ha calcato la mano su come le persone più vicine ad Assange non concordino con il comportamento tenuto dall'australiano e su come Birgitta Jonsdottir non si senta di escludere che le accuse rivolte ad Assange possano essere fondate, Repubblica non menziona nulla di quello ma si limita a riportare le affermazioni di Assange, dove, al contrario di quanto detto all'inizio, "si è mostrato prudente" dal valutare un'implicazione americana nella vicenda.

Oltretutto, lo stesso A ssange afferma "di aver incontrato le due donne (che lo hanno accusato, NdG) but refused to say whether he had had intimate relations with them, stressing that it is "a private matter."

summary, without detracting from the excellent work of Wikileaks to show material that nobody else would be aware of:

• Assange is now much more cautious and do not charge more than the Pentagon.
• He admits that he met the two women who accused him.
• People close to him move away from Assange and urged him to retrace his steps.

My impression is that he wanted to shoot the big Assange accusing the Pentagon, having nothing in hand to do so. In addition, Who more than he can retrieve material that proves that the Pentagon wanted to frame him?
was well aware that accusing the Pentagon would have the support of all (or most) of the Internet community, and took the opportunity.
are also inclined to think that the two women have glimpsed a chance to make a nice nest egg by raising this fuss and have not let the opportunity pass.
short, Assange, my impression is that this time you did it right "out of the jar" ... Meanwhile

much better publicity for Wikileaks ....

Baby Bottle Discolouration

Tom Woods - How Attivissimo

The next will be held on September 11 David Icke Meetup in Milan.

Pare che sia stato invitato anche Paolo Attivissimo.
E ci sarà anche Tom Bosco.

Si svolgerà quindi anche un interessante confronto fra i due con possibilità di interventi e contro interventi da ambo le parti e verrà riservato uno spazio per gli interventi dal pubblico.

Sarebbe interessante se, anche Massimo Mazzucco, maggior esponente italiano delle ipotesi di inside job per quanto riguarda l'11 settembre, nel caso non fosse stato invitato, volesse intervenire anche lui per rivolgere direttamente ad Attivissimo eventuali domande.

Sarebbe un interessante faccia a faccia, non trovate?

Malarone Malaria Tablets

(that idiot) than quixotic

E' comparso, sul sito comedonchisciotte.org, un articolo ( http://www.comedonchisciotte.org/site/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=7401&mode=&order=0&thold=0 ), linked, among others, the forum of Common Place (which is known to be a melting pot of interesting links) which speaks of the Schumann Resonance.

things first.
We chatted about recent incidents of crime.
We see in detail:

Watch the episode with a different eye crazy happened the other day in Milan: an ape Ukrainian certainly genetically predisposed, and argues with his girlfriend in retaliation for going out to kill the first woman to punch passing in front of him. And he finds it, for heaven's sake, and kill with their hands in the center of a city among the civilians with anyone who has the courage to intervene because the type is one who wants kill and heroes around at that hour there are none.

to me, dear friend, bounces on his head one terminology out of phase.

And over here is nothing to say about it.
But that "out of phase" takes on a deeper meaning.

The people on the planet, it is every day more and more out of phase. And you, who study and write about these things, I propose to meditate. Out of phase with that? It 'obvious. You know what the Schumann Resonance?

It is called this, after its discoverer, the vibrational frequency of the planet which, unfortunately, is rising more and more with a process that began in the late eighties and that seems unstoppable. Quest'aumento ha una serie di controindicazioni: si alzano anche le temperature globali, diminuisce il campo magnetico terrestre, aumentano i cataclismi naturali come eruzioni vulcaniche e terremoti. Ma soprattutto noi, esseri umani, non vibriamo più all'unisono con la Schumann e risultiamo 'sfasati' rispetto alla pulsazione di 7,83 Hertz, che era la frequenza originale. 'Fuori fase' che significa tante cose: meno creativi, meno intelligenti, più teledipendenti, più culturalmente analfabeti, più cavernicoli e pulsionalmente primitivi (ammazzo qualcuno a pugni perché sono incazzato o apro la pancia a uno perché mi ha guardato), in una parola più aggressivi. Anche se 'aggressività' in questi casi è un pejorative term, if not misleading

Ok. Schumann resonance exists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances
But the article says, summing up, which the vibrational frequency of the planet is rising so unstoppable, causing ' rising global temperatures, the increase in volcanic eruptions and earthquakes.
But above all we humans "do not vibrate more in unison," we go out of phase, become violent, kill and become less intelligent.
So even your intelligence, drafting ComeDonChiscioitte? Also that of the conspiracy? How? Your intelligence is not affected? Curious che voi ne siate immuni.

Ma andiamo avanti nella lettura dell'articolo:

Ma il cacciatore di coincidenze non può non notare intanto come la situazione climatica planetaria stia degenerando (Cina, Russia, Pakistan) nella generale indifferenza e con migliaia di morti al seguito. O come il disastroso terremoto di Haiti, fortemente sospettato da più parti di essere un prodotto “artificiale”, si sia verificato a pochissima distanza da una base HAARP (Arecibo), non implicando minimamente Santo Domingo.

O come, tenendo conto che HAARP sarebbe in grado – sempre secondo alcune fonti complottistiche - di creare in cielo effetti simili alle aurore boreali o altre immagini enigmatiche e suggestive, have increased a bit 'everywhere sightings of "strange things" over our heads.

Because you know, are always very reliable sources conspiracy true?
How do you say? Ah yes .. in the foot.
course in this beautiful melting pot we also end up chemtrails. The article points out a fact
note that Wikipedia says:

Some conspiracy theories seen in HAARP project to serve a hidden, ranging from the creation of electromagnetic weapon to cause earthquakes to climate control. These speculations are mostly related to the conspiracy theory about chemtrails.

E ', however, be noted that on February 5 1998 la sottocommissione "Sicurezza e disarmo" del Parlamento europeo tenne un'audizione in cui si parlò anche di HAARP. Benché invitati, i rappresentanti della NATO e degli USA preferirono non partecipare.

Ma insomma.. questo aumento di vibrazioni che provoca terremoti, cataclismi e ci fa diventare violenti al punto di ammazzare il primo che passa, da cosa è dovuto?
Ma ovviamente dall' High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, ovvero dall'HAARP.
E' ovvio! Stolti che siamo....
Ovviamente il tutto basato sul nulla...
Ad un certo punto, mi sono chiesto: ma il numero di uccisioni, terremoti, cataclismi è davvero in aumento? Sono really increase the life-threatening diseases caused by rubbish that would make us breathe the air that distribute both hands behind our backs, chemicals on our heads?
I wonder, why, why, because those who write these things does a little research first statistics on this? No.
. It 'much more comfortable to cry conspiracy that always pulls.

Let's see some 'of sound statistics:
at this address: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_homicide_rate find a comprehensive outline of the homicide rate (the number of murders every 100 000 inhabitants) over the last 10 years about 120 countries.
I allowed myself to make a graph with grouped nations so we get a bit 'of data.
I have excluded countries with reported rates of only 2-3 years, but the more complete.
However, you can check yourself in the original table, there are few nations where the rate is increasing, such as El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, where the issue of chemtrails do not go into the background, but she does not there.
Here:

Ohibò!
What is' is the story?
As we see from the chart, you can enlarge by clicking on it, we note that no nation in the homicide rate is rising. Where it is not stable is decreasing, such as Russia, Argentina, Bulgaria, Poland, Italy, France. And where is dimunizione is stable, such as Portugal, Greece, Switzerland.

But there's more ....
The article also talked about earthquakes and how many are becoming more frequent as a result of the increase "of the vibrational frequency"
Here is a statistic that indicates the trend of the occurrence of earthquakes:
http://earthquake .usgs.gov / Earthquakes / eqarchives / year / eqstats.php

And below is a graph explanatory:

diagram also can be increased by clicking above.
And what do we find?
What if it comes to earthquakes ranging between 5.0 and 5.9 scale in the last 10 years, the frequency has remained stable, with a slight downward trend over the last 3-4 years.
Forte instead of reducing shock between grades 4 and 4.9. Strong increase of between 3 and 3.9 shook until 2008 and then decrease. Strong decrease of the shock between grade 2 and 2.9.
So, in essence increasing the shock to the year 2004-2005 and then the general decrease in shock until 2009.
So there is no indication that the shock is increasing, in fact, generally in the last 5 years are decreasing.

think it's over?
No way.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_deadliest_natural_disasters Here is a list of the greatest natural disaster ever happened. In short
.
The ranking of the 10 biggest natural disaster says, sorted by the victims, as follows:

The earthquake in Haiti (which happens to be one of the places more earthquakes in the world, the term "plate tectonics" mean anything? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/Plates_tect2_it.svg ) is exactly the tenth in the standings.
If it is true that between 2000 and 2010 are two disasters, namely the 9th and 10th place, it is equally true that there are also two between 1970 and 1980 with a 4th place and 7th place.
So even here there is no indication of a worsening of natural disasters in recent times.
The page continues with a ranking of the "blizzards" (translated in about storm), then among other things, the ranking of the pandemic, where the most recent being in 1956 with the "Asian Flu". Then we
cyclones, where the most recent square 7th place, and 1971.

All subsequent classifications of natural disasters continue on the same wavelength as those described so far. In particular, the ranking of "floods" (flooding) shows that the last flood that happened in Europe that goes right to the charts, dates back to 1953 and occurred in the Netherlands, causing 2400 deaths.

Nothing, nothing, nothing suggests that statistics in hand, natural disasters are increasingly frequent.

have a few more things ....

According to statements of ComeDonChisciotte be going into an endless abyss.

diseases, insanity, murder, natural disasters, minor intelligenza sono tutti fattori che dovrebbero portarci alla morte prematuramente.

Ma anche qua le statistiche dicono il contrario.

A questa pagina trovate statistiche complete per quanto riguarda l'incidenza nel cancro negli USA.
http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/uscs/toptencancers.aspx

Qua sotto trovate un grafico ricavato dai dati prelevati dal link qua sopra con riportata l'incidenza del cancro negli USA negli anni dal 1999 al 2006:

Anche qua si nota come l'incidenza del cancro a "Lung and Bronchus" (Polmoni e Bronchi) sia in steady decline.
I took that kind of disease because the lungs and bronchi should be the organs most vulnerable to the "junk sprayed in heaven."
But even among the other diseases the incidence is declining with the exception of a couple.
The incidence of prostate cancer but is increasing and so is in Italy.
http://www.tumori.net/it/banca_dati/query.php Here you can see yourself statistics broken down by gender and type of tumor.
E 'apparent decline in lung cancer for men but increased for women.
remember that women have "begun after" smoking, and the results we see them now.

Here instead you can see a very complete PDF shows that the life expectancy is steadily increasing:
http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/worldmortality/WMR2009.htm
With all due respect Disaster natural and human madness.

So, my dear Donchisciottini / conspiracy / paranoid.
What do you think?