From sbellicarsi if there was laughter instead of tears. On
Luogocomune is always very topical topic September 11.
But even those who frequent the forum that really began to be fruit.
Someone belonging a new member, asked an interesting question, which is already placed in the past many times.
Let's see what the user says important Malcico in his opening speech of his thread ( http://snipurl.com/1xb905 ):
That said I have a question you have and it is this: given that the majority of people identified as suspected hijackers are still alive why do not you interview them? Surely the mainstream media would not notice but it would be a small step forward to shed more light especially in those who believe in good faith that the 11 / 9 19 Islamic terrorists have flown into the twin towers to punish America.
very thorny issue. What do we do now?
Schottolo , a character who, for various reasons has always put much in evidence, says: Why is a dead
Czech (sic). Once you've spent a lot of money to find them, (if any). They can always tell you that those aircraft have used false identities, or that the respondents are of the same name.
But how .. have been spent a lot of money for making movies, DVDs, documentaries and so on and a journalist fails to set aside a bit 'of money to plan such a mission could be the turning point in his career? When
today, with the means at our disposal, we were able to interview anyone, as rightly pointed out the same Malcico :
Come on, there are journalists che sono andati ad intervistare dittatori, terroristi, ex agenti della CIA, signori della droga e non ce ne uno in grado di scovare notizie su almeno uno di quei presunti terroristi? E i diretti interessati non riescono a far avere loro notizie in nessun modo? Ripeto il fatto che possano non essere mai esistiti lo posso credere ma che ci sono, sono ancora vivi e non si sa nulla su di essi mi sembra improbabile.
E poi, come giustamente fa notare un altro utente, sarebbe tutto nell'interesse di Al-Qaeda mostrare che quelli che sono considerati terroristi sono ancora vivi e vegeti. Quale occasione migliore per mostrare a tutto il mondo la colpevolezza del governo USA?
Infatti Malcico dice:
Mi pare strange that at least one of those who have been accused who are still alive and was unable to send a video where he denies that is involved in the attack. Do not tell the western media, that they would never see, but I think if it came to Al Jazeera there would be no problems.
Obviously nobody gives concrete answers, but others involved are limited to saying that it would be useless, as it did Schottolo recently with his remarks above.
But as we stick to details that are only shaky evidence on which to go for smoking guns, and in the face of overwhelming evidence so we will just say that it would be useless?
But it's over.
Unwittingly it a few days later, an article appears on the home page always LuogoComune (Decalagon and signed by Dr-Jackal), which deals with research carried out on the trail of nano-thermite found in dust and debris collected in areas close to that of the collapse of the towers.
part you already employed someone else. But there are the same, some parts very interesting to observe.
Here are some steps:
At first it was thought that these were small fragments of anti-rust paint dry, but scientists, after months of trials, have come to other conclusions.
And again
18 months of experiments and analysis which allowed the establishment of at least two parallel and independent studies
The article continues:
The instruments used for testing of the powder are as follows
- A scanning electron microscope FEI-XL30 SFEG (SEM)
- An EDAX X-ray device with an energy dispersive spectrometer (XEDS)
- A differential scanning calorimeter (Netzsch DSC 404C)
- A visible light microscope (VLM)
- A Nikon stereomicroscope Epiphot 200
- A stereomicroscope Olympus BX60
- A microscope and camera Nikon Labophot
's not all.
According to the proponents of official version, this means that the entire study lasted 18 months and played with all the trappings (and still waiting to be disproved), plus other independent studies have confirmed, are totally unacceptable as evidence.
recap:
to look for a hijacker who, according to conspiracy theorists say, it is still alive:
-
pointless - it would cost too much money and effort
But use equipment and highly professional expensive (with a little research it turns out that the first microscope that list costs between $ 125,000 and up) that will certainly not have been bought on purpose (the I sincerely hope), but will have their operating costs and keep employees and management scientists and researchers for 18 months (!!), here, consider this a necessary act, I think frankly ridiculous.
Besides going to interview the hijacker still alive would be a heavy boulder on the U.S. government.
But nothing doing.
The impression I always the most is that these characters are well clear of that one part could really create a breach in the beliefs of the most fervent supporter of the official story of September 11, but could d 'On the other hand definitely bury any ambition to discover a truth that has already come instead afloat for some time. in doubt, do not take any risks.
0 comments:
Post a Comment