Faux Linen Tablecloths

a long time since we say that the belief in the conspiracy (and I mean it as general as possible) is a matter of faith.

matter of faith because sometimes, I take the view that we should put an imaginary boundary line that you can not and should not cross.

A person arrived at that border can decide whether to continue with his ideas, and then we talk about faith, or to step back and revise their opinions.

beginning, in my naivety, I did not think was possible, that limit could not be overridden by those who have at least a little 'intellectual honesty. And a little 'consistency.
But two facts are, or are there people who do not have a shred of intellectual honesty, or why should that limit is exceeded because "surely find those who continue to support me."

The context is this:
a user opens a thread on the forum of common places where you can post pictures of the spacecraft to photograph the place where he was landing on the moon.
The photos also show the signs of the astronauts' moon walk.
The Apollo 15 Lunar Laser Ranging Retroreflector - A Fundamental Point on the Moon!

Read here what he writes Massimo Mazzucco on that same thread:

Now just to prove that those images are actually from the moon, and not by the model created in the studio. (Or maybe there's some zuzzurellone who thinks that we will publish the true images of the LRO if there on the moon there were no traces of Apollo 15?)
This, rather than "the end of lunacomplottisti" is the end of intelligence human.

Mazzucco asked to show that those photos are really coming from the moon and that really shows the lunar surface.

What could include such tests?
I have no idea how this case could really convince Mazzucco that we went to the moon.
If you repeat a trip to the moon, and this trip would be invited to participate in the same Mazzucco, probably would not be enough because the objection would be fairly obvious, namely, "Who tells me that we really stood up from the ground? Could have projected the images from windows of the shuttle to make me believe that he really landed on the moon, and during the mock journey, someone might have recreated the scene for me to really think to tread on the moon "and so on.

Speaking of another plot, talking example of September 11, Osama Bin Laden could go on and Mazzucco explain word for word as it developed the organization of the attacks, but in this case Bin Laden may have been paid by the U.S. government to lie and hold the game.

I mention this limit, the limit beyond which we should retrace his steps and assess: on the one hand argue that the moon we never went on the other I should be considering how many people were involved to carry the game and consider the evidence in support of the fact that we really went to the moon.
would need to take stock. And here comes the ' intellectual honesty. That honesty that you must bring to reconsider your idea. But

Obviously people like Mazzucco could never do that. What would you say to all those who bought his DVD?
What would you say to all those who donated money to fund its work?

It 'really a matter of faith ...